06/28/10

Who Should Judge How Good You Are?

Recording the latest episode of The Circle of Confusion, my co-presenter Peter Cox made an interesting remark. Having recently gained his Qualified European Photographer (QEP) qualification, he is now plotting his Fellowship with the Irish Professional Photographers Association (IPPA). He commented that he doesn’t yet feel he has a panel that is up to his standard.

That raises an interesting question. Who is the best person to judge how good you are and what level you’ve reached in your career?

A – Other professional photographers?

B – You yourself?

C – Your clients?

There is a case to be made for all three.

To me the most interesting one is the case that can be made for B.

While the recognition of your peers is nice to get, as is the appreciation of your paying customers, both of those can be a trap. They can lead you to complacency. That’s dangerous. Complacency kills creativity, and stymies development. That’s something you can’t allow as a professional photographer.

The only person who can guard against that is you, the photographer.

For me, this takes the form of a little voice at the back of my head – he’s a bit like a disapproving grandparent. He only ever says one thing: “You should have done better.” I’m glad he’s there. Otherwise, I’d be well on my way to complacency and irrelevance. I’m my own hardest taskmaster. I’m never satisfied. I hope I never am.

05/15/10

DON’T!

Yesterday, I had one of those conversations with someone that leaves you richer for having had it.

Maurice and his fiancee Elaine from Velvetine Studios were filming the wedding I was photographing, and we had a chance to chat over dinner. Our meandering conversation never strayed far from our shared philosophy of recording a wedding. A philosophy that is best captured in a single word: “Don’t!”

Let me explain.

While the bride was getting ready, I saw that a wonderful photograph was possible, involving a reflection in the mirror on a wardrobe door. I got quite excited, and set myself to capture it – only for one of the bridesmaids to swing the door open so the bride could see herself. Amazing shot – gone.

Elaine asked whether I wasn’t tempted to intervene; tell the girls we’d get a great shot if they positioned the door right.

I said I wasn’t. That would have meant interfering with the day. The bridesmaid opened the door – that’s what happened. It might have ruined the photograph, but that’s less important than letting people get on with it. I’m there to record what happens, not direct it. Hence: “Don’t” when it comes to moving things. What happens, happens – that’s what a documentary photographer should photograph.

Maurice and Elaine video weddings with a similar philosophy. They film documentaries, they record life.

Unsurprisingly, it is very easy for me to work alongside them. On Friday, we moved around each other easily and elegantly, despite the three of us working in the same space. A shared philosophy leads to mutual respect for the other’s needs. Everyone wins – especially the couple getting married.

Maurice O'Carroll of Velvetine Studios at work, Fossa, Co Kerry, Ireland

Maurice at work at the Prince of Peace church in Fossa, Co. Kerry ... You'll have to look hard to see him. (c) Roger Overall 2010

04/6/10

Value

I photographed a wedding at the weekend where I was asked to stay a bit later and cover the speeches.

In Ireland, the speeches usually follow the wedding dinner, so I had a little downtime and a quick bite to eat in the hotel bar while the couple and their guests enjoyed their meal.

Not feeling very inspired, I ordered the beef burger and chips from the bar menu.

Now, I don’t know about you, but “Beef Burger” brings to mind an image. Quite frankly, to me it means the same as “Hamburger”.

This is what was put in front of me:

Beef Burger and Chips

Beef burger and chips for €11. (c) Roger Overall 2010

I did a double take – and then checked the menu again. What you see is actually what was described on it. I hadn’t bothered to read the small-print description properly before ordering. I just assumed it would be a burger on a bun. My bad.

But that wasn’t really what bothered me. What bothered me was the price: €10.95.

That’s right, €11 for a patty, a slack handful of chips and a dollop of potato salad hidden under a slice of tomato.

Eleven.

Euros.

And the glass of Coke and ice you can see there? That cost €5.20.

Five euros! I can get a couple of two-litre bottles for that at my local supermarket.

The entire meal, with a coffee cost me close to €20.

Which raises the question of price in relation to product. It’s an important issue because my own services don’t come cheap. For instance, my couples pay very close to €3,000 to have me photograph up to the speeches. And I’m undercharging at that. I’m actually developing a wedding product at the moment that is unique (as far as I’m aware) and which I will offer at prices starting at around €5,000, possibly €7,500.

Now, you probably think I’ve become separated from my marbles. How can I complain about an €11 burger, even if it does come without a bun and minimal chips, when I’m charging that kind of money for my own work? Pot. Kettle. Black. Hypocrite.

The answer is value for money.

For €11, I’m practically expecting Mishima beef … Okay that’s an exaggeration. I’m guessing a Mishima beef patty would be an absolute steal at €11. But you get what I’m driving at. Provided the price matches the value expectation, the consumer is happy.

Let’s look at what my wedding clients get for their €3,000 investment.

They get emotive documentary photography of one of the most significant days in their lives. They get my respect, which means I step back from the day rather than trying to run it for them. They get to live the day as they want to, and I record it in such a way that they will treasure the photographs all their lives.

The album my couples get will last a century at the very least, most likely double that. Being very conservative, that’s 100 (years) x 365 (days) = 36,500 days (excluding leap year days).

€3,000/36,500 days = €0.08/day.

So for eight euro cents per day a couple gets a highest-quality book of evocative photographs depicting one of the most wonderful days of their life. Their children, grandchildren and great grandchildren also benefit hugely from that eight cents a day.

Tell me that isn’t value for money. Certainly compared to a €11 beef burger – which was as tough as boots, I might add.

04/1/10

An Epiphany – Part 3

You are infinitely important to people you will never meet, including yourself.”

If you’re coming to this series of posts cold, you can find catch up here: Part 1 and Part 2.

So, why the addition of “including yourself”?

If you’ve followed the logic of Part 2, you’ll see that documentary wedding photography produced today will be of incalculable value to people in the future. That includes you. The human memory is a fragile and fickle thing. Documentary photography helps you relive your life – or part of it. Your future self will have great benefit from photography commissioned by you today.

Thing is, your future self is a totally different person from your current self. You live, you mature, you absorb experiences both good and  bad, you develop.

You as a 60-year-old is someone you can’t imagine today.

Your present self will never meet your future self, yet you could hardly be more important to them. In fact, if your future self could speak to you now they’d probably tell you to lay off the burgers, cigarettes and beer, and to put a tenner on I’m a Squeaky Horseshoe in the 2023 Grand National. They’d also be mighty happy you were forward thinking enough to commission a photographic record of your life today.

03/30/10

An Epiphany – Part 2

Yesterday I revealed that this is the keystone of my photography:

“You are infinitely important to people you will never meet, including yourself.”

I’ve had quite a bit of feedback today. All of it good, especially when I’ve explained what I mean and how it could possibly relate to photography.

The best explanation I can give you is this photograph, which says it all:

Cup Cakes

My philosophy of photography. (c) Roger Overall 2010

I can’t explain it any clearer.

Okay, not everyone in the audience is getting it, so I’ll have to spell it out.

The concept works both for private individuals and for business clients.

Private individuals first. Answer me this question: Would you like to have great-great-great grandchildren?

Most of us would. I know I’d like to.

Thing is, you’ll never meet them. You’d like to think that your line will continue that far into the future, though. We’re talking around AD 2150-2200, give or take, it doesn’t really matter. What matters is that you are not going to live that long. I don’t care how much muesli you eat. You are never going to be invited round to their place.

Nevertheless, you could not be more important to them. Without you they will never exist. Just like you wouldn’t have been here were it not for your own great-great-great grandparents. Look at the cup cakes and the stand in the photograph above. Without each individual tier below it, the next tier up wouldn’t be able to stand. You’re the bottom tier, your descendants are the ones higher up.

And do you think that your distant descendants will want to know about you?

Of course they will. Unless you invade Poland or something, in which case they’re going to change their names and pretend they were hewn from pure amber by gypsy elves.

You get where I’m going with this?

More than any other form of photography, documentary photography is a wonderful way for you to connect with your unseen ancestors. For instance, the story of your wedding day told properly through photographs will reveal who you were, what you did, your history on that day, the emotions you felt. It is a window from the distant future all the way back to your past. It provides information that your great-great-great grandchildren will be so grateful for.

If you doubt this at all, just imagine having the kind of documentary photographs you’ve seen on this blog of your own great-great-great grandparents’ wedding. Tell me you wouldn’t cherish that.

That’s why it’s important to me that my private clients understand that their lives and their history have massive value, and because of that they are infinitely important to people they will never meet.

In part 3 I’ll explain why I added “including yourself”.

And in part 4 I’ll show how this works for businesses.

03/29/10

An Epiphany – Part 1

Somewhere on my travels last week, I had a thought.

I have many, but this one was actually important. For me, least ways.

I’m not altogether certain when or where the thought occurred, but forensic analysis of my notebook would suggest it happened between 10.26AM and 12.10PM on Tuesday last week. Most likely in the departures lounge at Cork airport.

That’s the best I can do.

I’m sure, when asked, Einstein was able to say when exactly (or relatively) and in which temporal reality E=MC2 flashed into his consciousness. Well, bully for him. I’m not a physics genius. Just ask my high school teacher.

Sorry, we seem to have strayed off a bit there.

So, what is this thought I had and why is it so important?

It is important because it gives me a unifying concept upon which to base my work. It helps lay bare the deep-seated philosophy that underpins what I do.

It is this:

“You are infinitely important to people you will never meet.”

Today, I refined it:

“You are infinitely important to people you will never meet, including yourself.”

I’ll leave you to dwell on that for a day or so.

03/17/10

St Patrick’s Day In Cork

Well, as you can see from the photograph below, things got totally out of hand at the St Patrick’s Day parade here in Cork earlier.

Crocodile Eats Press Photographer In Cork, Ireland

Moments later, he was gone. (c) Roger Overall 2010

A massive crocodile escaped from the secret zoology labs at UCC and went on the rampage, encouraged by one of Cork’s traffic wardens – that’s her with the sword. Police fired tear gas, but to no avail.

This press photographer tried to get a close up photograph using a wide-angle lens and a flash gun.

He was eaten.

I’ll spare you the photograph of that.

OK, OK … It didn’t happen.

If truth be told, the secret giant UCC reptiles almost never escape.

There is, though, a serious point to this. In fact, there are two.

1) A documentary photographer is constantly editing reality. This can be done to show the subject in a benign light, or in a negative one. The photograph above shows by far the most original float in the parade. It was fabulous. But it never set off in pursuit of the photographer. He simply turned away at the right moment to give me this shot. The smoke is from the float itself – a special effect. There’s a lesson here. You have to be careful how you photograph things – people just might believe what they think they’re seeing.

2) The second point is this: photographs are not worth a thousand words. Often, photographs are incomprehensible without a caption. You need to understand the context to fully appreciate many documentary pictures. Not always, sure, but you often have to supply words to give the viewer the complete picture – if you’ll forgive the pun. Imagine if you’d only seen the photograph above without any explanation. You’d have no idea what was happening.

And you’d never know about UCC’s covert reptile programme.

10/27/09

Elliott’s Way

[This post first appeared a couple of days ago on From Bath to Cork with Baby Grace, the blog of my good friend Paul O’Mahony. When he heard I was going to the US to hear one of my heroes speak, he encouraged me to write about the experience. I’m glad he did.]

On Meeting Elliott Erwitt

Inevitably, somebody fell for it.

“What’s with the egg?” a lady in the audience asked.

“What egg?” Elliott Erwitt responded.

“You have a fried egg on your lapel.”

“I have a fried egg on my lapel?!”

It’s a fake, bought in Japan and pinned on to Erwitt’s dark blazer because he “likes to be interesting”.

Elliott Erwitt was born in Paris 82 years ago, lived in Italy, escaped from Europe to the US on one of the last boats out during World War II, became one of the greats of modern photography and has produced some of the world’s most famous and iconic images. He’s already interesting without the egg.

He was speaking at the Blanton Museum of Art in Austin, Texas, at the invitation of the newly established Austin Center for Photography. It was a rare opportunity to hear one of the greats deliver a lecture. In Erwitt’s case, possibly the only one I would ever get. So I flew thousands of miles to be there.

The timing of the lecture was prescient. When the talk was announced, I was going through a transition in my career – or, to be more precise, finalizing the direction of that transition. The consequences of the planned change were significant for my business, my development as a photographer and for my home life. I would be abandoning the safety (and mediocrity) of a bland approach to corporate photography based on the tastes of my local market in favour of a purely documentary approach based on my own preferences. Faced with the enormity of the implications that the change would bring, I was wavering.

The announcement of Erwitt’s lecture appeared to be a soft nudge – a gentle “Go on” from the gods of silver halide and pixels.

It would have been rude not to have bought a ticket.

And so I did, never more ready to hear the secrets of documentary photography, eager for the rich insights Erwitt would provide. Each one would be a beacon, a signpost to how to produce great documentary photography, culminating in a solid blueprint for my glorious future.

In fact, I learned nothing from the lecture that I had hoped for. Not a single thing.

However, while the lecture itself was barren ground, the experience of the lecture produced a valuable lesson.

First, though, I should explain why Erwitt’s presentation was so disappointing. To do so, I have to draw upon the memories of another disappointment.

Walking down Congress Avenue on the way back to the hotel after the lecture, “Layla” started up in one of the bars. The electric version, not the acoustic. You know, the real one, the plugged-in one. One of my all time favourite songs.

I remembered the last time I heard it. It was a while ago and Eric Clapton was playing it himself, in the flesh. Not just for me, you understand. He was playing at Cork’s annual month-long summer music festival and my wife was sent by a newspaper to review the concert. There was an extra ticket with the job, so I went along.

The concert wasn’t great, to be honest, but it was memorable – if only for that single song. Towards the end, Clapton and the band started up with “Layla” and played it to the finishing note, right through the long coda. It made the entire concert worthwhile. More, it added to my life experience. I’d heard an iconic song played by the man himself, including the tail end that radio stations generally erase.

OK, so it wasn’t the kind of event that was going to change my outlook on the universe, but it it’ll get into my top 250 on my deathbed. Somewhere around the 220s.

Which is higher than attending Elliott Erwitt’s lecture is going to get. That may not even scrape into the top 500. Which is odd at first glance, as I’m a big Erwitt fan; much less so of Clapton.

So, how does that work?

(C) Elliott Erwitt - One of my favourite photographs of Erwitt's, taken in Ballycotton, Co. Cork, where I was married. He confided during the lecture that he had barked at the dog to startle it, though he may have been kidding. His sense of humour is so subtle, it can be hard to tell.

(c) Elliott Erwitt - One of my favourite photographs of Erwitt's, taken in Ballycotton, Co. Cork, where I was married. He confided during the lecture that he had barked at the dog to startle it, though he may have been kidding. His sense of humour is so subtle, it can be hard to tell.

For a start there is something magical about hearing a musician live on stage. We all know that. Whether you’re into opera or death metal, for the fan an in-the-flesh performance is a far superior experience than listening to an mp3 on an iPod. U2 and Springsteen don’t sell out football grounds for nothing.

Watching a photographer push a button on a MacBook to bring up the next photograph on an auditorium screen just isn’t the same. There are much better ways to view photographs to enjoy them fully. Exhibitions, books, your own computer screen.

What a photographer can bring to a slideshow of their work are the stories behind the photographs, insights into what drives their work, an explanation of their philosophy, their views on the overwhelming number of challenges faced by individual photographers and the industry as a whole today. Photography is a meaty topic.

Sadly, Erwitt didn’t stray beyond the occasional anecdote. Those he did tell were interesting rather than insightful, delivered with an engaging and charming dry sense of humour that mirrors his photography.

Ultimately, his hour-long lecture was a slideshow of mostly familiar work, many of which were the best-selling photographs he is known for and few of which were new work unfamiliar to his audience.

Paradoxically, that’s the formula that most bands apply when they perform live – if they have any sense. We want to hear musicians play their hits, the songs we all love, the oldies. Mostly, we don’t care for the new stuff, particularly if a band is trying something new. Give us “Layla” – and it had better be the electric version.

Attending a lecture by a photographer is the opposite. If they’re merely presenting a slideshow, it’s got to be of work we haven’t seen yet. We know the old stuff and most likely will have read about the story behind it – certainly in the case of work by a living legend like Elliott Erwitt, which gets lots of press.

Here was a chance to hear a man of stature, a photographer of intellect and intelligence, an artist whose work is both significant and beautiful, deliver a lecture. Sadly, all we got was a brief discussion about some of his most famous work, ultimately adding little to what we already knew.

Certainly, it didn’t help me with any grand scheme of documentary photography; its place, its role and its merits in a corporate environment. There was no blueprint here. This was a great of the profession simply recounting his greatest hits.

Oh well, at least I was able get a signed book in the foyer afterwards.

Standing in line with a copy of “Elliott Erwitt’s Hands”, I watched the people ahead of me fill out their names on blue Post-It notes offered by one of the ACP’s hierarchy.

Write your name clearly and fix it to the page you want Elliott to inscribe, we were told.

The older lady in front of me wrote down a quote she wanted written down and signed. At the signing desk, Erwitt’s minder took the book, glanced at the text on the Post-It, and removed it from the book.

“He doesn’t do that,” she said, frostily.

Older Lady had to make do with her name, just like everyone else.

I had thought it cheeky that she’d even attempted to put words into Erwitt’s mouth. Insulting even.

The thought sparked another, and another. Suddenly, I was richer for the experience of the lecture.

All right, I hadn’t heard what I’d wanted to. I’d heard what Elliott Erwitt was willing to tell. Just like he wasn’t going to validate anyone else’s words by being told what to inscribe, he wasn’t going to have the content of his lecture dictated to him. He did what he did, and if I didn’t like it, tough.

For 82 years, Elliott Erwitt had gone his own way, done his own thing and it had made him a great in photography.

There is no blueprint; there are no answers.

Success is grounded in uniqueness. Uniqueness cannot be taught.

If I’m going to make a success of corporate photojournalism, I’ll have to do it my way; find my own footing and make my own choice of lapel decoration.

10/12/09

A Road Less Traveled

I’ve reached a crossroads with my work. Actually, I’ve passed the crossroads, having decided which route I’m going to take, and I’m a few yards down the new track.

It’s exhilarating and at the same time a little scary. Leaps of faith always are.

It’s also tremendously liberating. It feels something like this, or at least I imagine it does:

Dolphins in the Atlantic Ocean - (c) Roger Overall 2009

Dolphins in the Atlantic Ocean - (c) Roger Overall 2009

So, welcome to the new blog, where from now on I’ll be covering all aspects of my work, regardless of whether it concerns  corporate commissions or private assignments. They’ll all have one thing in common: a documentary approach. That’s the plan, anyway. That’s the road I’ve chosen.